Getting My h4831sc load data To Work

I gave up on it and went to other powder if the new powder was establishing far more stress and was slower compared to old stuff. I don't try to remember if I even tried using standard h4831 or not; I'm thinking not.

Ballistically, Hodgdon H4831 SC Powder is the precise duplicate of H4831. Bodily, it's a shorter grain dimension, as a result, the designation SC or quick Slice. The shorter, additional compact kernels enable the powder to circulation throughout the powder measures much more smoothly, helping to relieve the continual reducing of granules.

This is among the largest motives reloaders are admonished to implement new data only; and to get started on minimal whenever you obtain a different number of powder. You do not seriously know (Except the corporation tells you so) that your new lot of powder was even made at the same manufacturing unit given that the powder you purchased a few years back.

Meaning the knowledgable handloader can, with a few extrapolation, discover a beginning load when only one is shown for a specific cartridge.

IMR powders also preform perfectly for me with 1 notable exception. The many chrongraphing I've done with them signifies the velecity is consistant previously mentioned 32 degrees but starts to differ after the temp starts to drop. The nearer to zero I get the greater they range. I have observed up to 250 fps in a ten shot string with my 243 and 223 from the Wintertime time around here. Have not noticed this with a lot of the other powders.

Given that there will not look like any "official" Load Data around for this Load, can many of you supply a place to begin with this combination and items to think about when Doing work this Load up?

I'm working with it having a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 was not as exact. RL22 did nicely but I used to be a little bit concerned about temp stability. I feel I am at 72 grains and obtain about 2850ish fps

While this is most likely real, there's a lot extra to it than just not blowing you up. He couldn't strike prairie h4831sc dogs outside of about 150 yards, so I'm guessing that inconsistent combustion was not carrying out just about anything favorable for his grouping skill with Individuals loads.

At this time making use of IMR 4831 in a 300WSM, and see the H4831sc is a well-liked choice for this caliber h4831 vs h4831sc and yields somewhat more velocity. Apart from it remaining quick Slash, precisely what is the difference in these two powders, and may I switch to H4831sc?

It is amusing how over the years loading countless distinctive cartridges in many different rifles which i have not gained suitable conclude benefits with H-4831 or the limited-Lower Variation.

Run your load up with the particular powder (sc or frequent) and ton you're applying although. Similar burn level does not imply it can behave "particularly" the same. I've viewed above one hundred fps difference between sc and mil-surp plenty of H4831.

Again to aged web page Shut When there is nearly anything as part of your cart, it won't be brought more than towards the old site.

Can I believe that H4831 can be substituted for H4831sc ? I realize the Bodily change but will it impact the burn off or velocity? I do think not but I am not 100% certain.

I sawed 1 in fifty percent to view how thick the jackets ended up, they usually were being easily twice as thick as a 50-grain hollow point was. Ditto for your 64-grain Energy Stage, as these bullets are developed for deer, not prairie puppies or woodchucks. You now know almost everything I find out about the 22-250 and sluggish-burning powders, and I don't know anything h4831sc load data at all in any respect in regards to the 223. I doubt that you're going to get anywhere with that cartridge and 4831, but let's know the way it goes.